Review



pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd4  (Elabscience Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Elabscience Biotechnology manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Elabscience Biotechnology pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd4
    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), <t>CD4</t> + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.
    Pe Cyanine7 Anti Mouse Cd4, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pmc13080324-162-48-51?v=Elabscience+Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 8 article reviews
    pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression"

    Article Title: Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression

    Journal: Cancer Research

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-25-3092

    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), CD4 + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), CD4 + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Knockdown, RNA Sequencing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Injection

    Combination therapy enhances the anti–PD-L1 immunotherapeutic effect in gastric cancer. A and B, After tumor formation, the orthotopic gastric cancer mice ( n = 5 per group) were treated with anti–PD-L1 (100 μg per mouse), GPR34 inhibitor (20 mg/kg), or XBP1s inhibitor (30 mg/kg) every 3 days or ACh inhibitor (2.5 mg/kg) daily. Combinations of anti–PD-L1 with each inhibitor followed the every 3-day dosing schedule for a total duration of 2 weeks via i.p. injection. Living images were used to monitor tumor progression at 5-day intervals from the time of drug administration ( A ); IHC and mIF were performed to detect PD-L1 and XBP1s levels and proportions of CD4 + (green) and CD8 + (red) T cells in gastric cancer tissues at the end of treatments ( B ). Scale bars, 1.000e+5 –∼ 5.000e + 5 p/s/cm 2 /sr for living images; 200 μm for IHC; 50 μm for immunofluorescence. C and D, Representative images ( C ) and tumor volume ( D ) of subcutaneous tumors. The administration protocol for the mice was consistent with the description provided in A and B . **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Combination therapy enhances the anti–PD-L1 immunotherapeutic effect in gastric cancer. A and B, After tumor formation, the orthotopic gastric cancer mice ( n = 5 per group) were treated with anti–PD-L1 (100 μg per mouse), GPR34 inhibitor (20 mg/kg), or XBP1s inhibitor (30 mg/kg) every 3 days or ACh inhibitor (2.5 mg/kg) daily. Combinations of anti–PD-L1 with each inhibitor followed the every 3-day dosing schedule for a total duration of 2 weeks via i.p. injection. Living images were used to monitor tumor progression at 5-day intervals from the time of drug administration ( A ); IHC and mIF were performed to detect PD-L1 and XBP1s levels and proportions of CD4 + (green) and CD8 + (red) T cells in gastric cancer tissues at the end of treatments ( B ). Scale bars, 1.000e+5 –∼ 5.000e + 5 p/s/cm 2 /sr for living images; 200 μm for IHC; 50 μm for immunofluorescence. C and D, Representative images ( C ) and tumor volume ( D ) of subcutaneous tumors. The administration protocol for the mice was consistent with the description provided in A and B . **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Injection, Immunofluorescence



    Similar Products

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec anti cd4 pe
    Anti Cd4 Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pmc13355016-7-0-2?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd4 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec cd4 pe vio 770
    Flow immunophenotyping release testing data are presented in A-G and IFNγ ELISpot data presented in H-K (Arm A: n = 12; Arms B/C: n = 27). Each data point represents a separate TAA-T cell product infused into patients (biological replicates). Lower whisker is defined as the minima, upper whisker is defined as the maxima, center is defined as median, lower bound of box is defined as Q1 (25th percentile), and upper bound of box is defined as Q3 (75th percentile). a ) % Total T cells (CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=51, Maxima=99, Median=97, 25th Percentile=95, 75th Percentile=99; Arms B/C: Minima=31, Maxima=100, Median=97, 25th Percentile=94, 75th Percentile=98. b ) % <t>CD4</t> + T cells (CD3 + CD4+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.50, Maxima=88, Median=16, 25th Percentile=2.6, 75th Percentile=38; Arms B/C: Minima=0.40, Maxima=55, Median=9.9, 25th Percentile=6.1, 75th Percentile=17. c ) %CD8 + T cells (% CD3 + CD8+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=4.3, Maxima=88, Median=37, 25th Percentile=22, 75th Percentile=47; Arms B/C: Minima=19, Maxima=91, Median=51, 25th Percentile=36, 75th Percentile=71. d ) % αβ T cells (% TCRαβ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=8.2, Maxima=94, Median=69, 25th Percentile=28, 75th Percentile=86; Arms B/C: Minima=32, Maxima=98, Median=71, 25th Percentile=48, 75th Percentile=84. e ) % γδ T cells (% TCRγδ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=5.1, Maxima=79, Median=28, 25th Percentile=8.4, 75th Percentile=67; Arms B/C: Minima=1.1, Maxima=83, Median=25, 25th Percentile=10, 75th Percentile=53. f ) % CD3 + CD16 + CD56+ of CD45 + . Arm A: Minima=2.8, Maxima=25, Median=11, 25th Percentile=7.2, 75th Percentile=17; Arms B/C: Minima=3.4, Maxima=64, Median=16, 25th Percentile=8.1, 75th Percentile=28. g ) % NK cells (CD16/CD56 + CD3- of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.40, Maxima=48, Median=1.0, 25th Percentile=0.48, 75th Percentile=4.6; Arms B/C: Minima=0.10, Maxima=62, Median=1.6, 25th Percentile=0.60, 75th Percentile=6.1. h - i ) IFNγ ELISpot with background correction for Arm A ( h ) and Arms B/C ( i ). Negative values after background normalization have been normalized to zero for visual representation.
    Cd4 Pe Vio 770, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pmc13375545-448-86-88?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 pe vio 770 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec cd4 pe
    Flow immunophenotyping release testing data are presented in A-G and IFNγ ELISpot data presented in H-K (Arm A: n = 12; Arms B/C: n = 27). Each data point represents a separate TAA-T cell product infused into patients (biological replicates). Lower whisker is defined as the minima, upper whisker is defined as the maxima, center is defined as median, lower bound of box is defined as Q1 (25th percentile), and upper bound of box is defined as Q3 (75th percentile). a ) % Total T cells (CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=51, Maxima=99, Median=97, 25th Percentile=95, 75th Percentile=99; Arms B/C: Minima=31, Maxima=100, Median=97, 25th Percentile=94, 75th Percentile=98. b ) % <t>CD4</t> + T cells (CD3 + CD4+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.50, Maxima=88, Median=16, 25th Percentile=2.6, 75th Percentile=38; Arms B/C: Minima=0.40, Maxima=55, Median=9.9, 25th Percentile=6.1, 75th Percentile=17. c ) %CD8 + T cells (% CD3 + CD8+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=4.3, Maxima=88, Median=37, 25th Percentile=22, 75th Percentile=47; Arms B/C: Minima=19, Maxima=91, Median=51, 25th Percentile=36, 75th Percentile=71. d ) % αβ T cells (% TCRαβ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=8.2, Maxima=94, Median=69, 25th Percentile=28, 75th Percentile=86; Arms B/C: Minima=32, Maxima=98, Median=71, 25th Percentile=48, 75th Percentile=84. e ) % γδ T cells (% TCRγδ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=5.1, Maxima=79, Median=28, 25th Percentile=8.4, 75th Percentile=67; Arms B/C: Minima=1.1, Maxima=83, Median=25, 25th Percentile=10, 75th Percentile=53. f ) % CD3 + CD16 + CD56+ of CD45 + . Arm A: Minima=2.8, Maxima=25, Median=11, 25th Percentile=7.2, 75th Percentile=17; Arms B/C: Minima=3.4, Maxima=64, Median=16, 25th Percentile=8.1, 75th Percentile=28. g ) % NK cells (CD16/CD56 + CD3- of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.40, Maxima=48, Median=1.0, 25th Percentile=0.48, 75th Percentile=4.6; Arms B/C: Minima=0.10, Maxima=62, Median=1.6, 25th Percentile=0.60, 75th Percentile=6.1. h - i ) IFNγ ELISpot with background correction for Arm A ( h ) and Arms B/C ( i ). Negative values after background normalization have been normalized to zero for visual representation.
    Cd4 Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pm42151478-326-192-195?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec ‒ anti cd137 pe vio 615
    Flow immunophenotyping release testing data are presented in A-G and IFNγ ELISpot data presented in H-K (Arm A: n = 12; Arms B/C: n = 27). Each data point represents a separate TAA-T cell product infused into patients (biological replicates). Lower whisker is defined as the minima, upper whisker is defined as the maxima, center is defined as median, lower bound of box is defined as Q1 (25th percentile), and upper bound of box is defined as Q3 (75th percentile). a ) % Total T cells (CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=51, Maxima=99, Median=97, 25th Percentile=95, 75th Percentile=99; Arms B/C: Minima=31, Maxima=100, Median=97, 25th Percentile=94, 75th Percentile=98. b ) % <t>CD4</t> + T cells (CD3 + CD4+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.50, Maxima=88, Median=16, 25th Percentile=2.6, 75th Percentile=38; Arms B/C: Minima=0.40, Maxima=55, Median=9.9, 25th Percentile=6.1, 75th Percentile=17. c ) %CD8 + T cells (% CD3 + CD8+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=4.3, Maxima=88, Median=37, 25th Percentile=22, 75th Percentile=47; Arms B/C: Minima=19, Maxima=91, Median=51, 25th Percentile=36, 75th Percentile=71. d ) % αβ T cells (% TCRαβ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=8.2, Maxima=94, Median=69, 25th Percentile=28, 75th Percentile=86; Arms B/C: Minima=32, Maxima=98, Median=71, 25th Percentile=48, 75th Percentile=84. e ) % γδ T cells (% TCRγδ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=5.1, Maxima=79, Median=28, 25th Percentile=8.4, 75th Percentile=67; Arms B/C: Minima=1.1, Maxima=83, Median=25, 25th Percentile=10, 75th Percentile=53. f ) % CD3 + CD16 + CD56+ of CD45 + . Arm A: Minima=2.8, Maxima=25, Median=11, 25th Percentile=7.2, 75th Percentile=17; Arms B/C: Minima=3.4, Maxima=64, Median=16, 25th Percentile=8.1, 75th Percentile=28. g ) % NK cells (CD16/CD56 + CD3- of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.40, Maxima=48, Median=1.0, 25th Percentile=0.48, 75th Percentile=4.6; Arms B/C: Minima=0.10, Maxima=62, Median=1.6, 25th Percentile=0.60, 75th Percentile=6.1. h - i ) IFNγ ELISpot with background correction for Arm A ( h ) and Arms B/C ( i ). Negative values after background normalization have been normalized to zero for visual representation.
    ‒ Anti Cd137 Pe Vio 615, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pm42098128-440-36-41?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ‒ anti cd137 pe vio 615 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec cd4 pe cy7
    Flow immunophenotyping release testing data are presented in A-G and IFNγ ELISpot data presented in H-K (Arm A: n = 12; Arms B/C: n = 27). Each data point represents a separate TAA-T cell product infused into patients (biological replicates). Lower whisker is defined as the minima, upper whisker is defined as the maxima, center is defined as median, lower bound of box is defined as Q1 (25th percentile), and upper bound of box is defined as Q3 (75th percentile). a ) % Total T cells (CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=51, Maxima=99, Median=97, 25th Percentile=95, 75th Percentile=99; Arms B/C: Minima=31, Maxima=100, Median=97, 25th Percentile=94, 75th Percentile=98. b ) % <t>CD4</t> + T cells (CD3 + CD4+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.50, Maxima=88, Median=16, 25th Percentile=2.6, 75th Percentile=38; Arms B/C: Minima=0.40, Maxima=55, Median=9.9, 25th Percentile=6.1, 75th Percentile=17. c ) %CD8 + T cells (% CD3 + CD8+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=4.3, Maxima=88, Median=37, 25th Percentile=22, 75th Percentile=47; Arms B/C: Minima=19, Maxima=91, Median=51, 25th Percentile=36, 75th Percentile=71. d ) % αβ T cells (% TCRαβ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=8.2, Maxima=94, Median=69, 25th Percentile=28, 75th Percentile=86; Arms B/C: Minima=32, Maxima=98, Median=71, 25th Percentile=48, 75th Percentile=84. e ) % γδ T cells (% TCRγδ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=5.1, Maxima=79, Median=28, 25th Percentile=8.4, 75th Percentile=67; Arms B/C: Minima=1.1, Maxima=83, Median=25, 25th Percentile=10, 75th Percentile=53. f ) % CD3 + CD16 + CD56+ of CD45 + . Arm A: Minima=2.8, Maxima=25, Median=11, 25th Percentile=7.2, 75th Percentile=17; Arms B/C: Minima=3.4, Maxima=64, Median=16, 25th Percentile=8.1, 75th Percentile=28. g ) % NK cells (CD16/CD56 + CD3- of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.40, Maxima=48, Median=1.0, 25th Percentile=0.48, 75th Percentile=4.6; Arms B/C: Minima=0.10, Maxima=62, Median=1.6, 25th Percentile=0.60, 75th Percentile=6.1. h - i ) IFNγ ELISpot with background correction for Arm A ( h ) and Arms B/C ( i ). Negative values after background normalization have been normalized to zero for visual representation.
    Cd4 Pe Cy7, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/us12606831-165-2-8?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd4
    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), <t>CD4</t> + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.
    Pe Cyanine7 Anti Mouse Cd4, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pmc13080324-162-48-51?v=Elabscience+Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology anti cd4 antibody
    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), <t>CD4</t> + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.
    Anti Cd4 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pm41966487-95-14-16?v=Elabscience+Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd4 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    R&D Systems cd4 pe
    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), <t>CD4</t> + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.
    Cd4 Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cd4+pe/pm41944190-300-7-9?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Flow immunophenotyping release testing data are presented in A-G and IFNγ ELISpot data presented in H-K (Arm A: n = 12; Arms B/C: n = 27). Each data point represents a separate TAA-T cell product infused into patients (biological replicates). Lower whisker is defined as the minima, upper whisker is defined as the maxima, center is defined as median, lower bound of box is defined as Q1 (25th percentile), and upper bound of box is defined as Q3 (75th percentile). a ) % Total T cells (CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=51, Maxima=99, Median=97, 25th Percentile=95, 75th Percentile=99; Arms B/C: Minima=31, Maxima=100, Median=97, 25th Percentile=94, 75th Percentile=98. b ) % CD4 + T cells (CD3 + CD4+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.50, Maxima=88, Median=16, 25th Percentile=2.6, 75th Percentile=38; Arms B/C: Minima=0.40, Maxima=55, Median=9.9, 25th Percentile=6.1, 75th Percentile=17. c ) %CD8 + T cells (% CD3 + CD8+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=4.3, Maxima=88, Median=37, 25th Percentile=22, 75th Percentile=47; Arms B/C: Minima=19, Maxima=91, Median=51, 25th Percentile=36, 75th Percentile=71. d ) % αβ T cells (% TCRαβ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=8.2, Maxima=94, Median=69, 25th Percentile=28, 75th Percentile=86; Arms B/C: Minima=32, Maxima=98, Median=71, 25th Percentile=48, 75th Percentile=84. e ) % γδ T cells (% TCRγδ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=5.1, Maxima=79, Median=28, 25th Percentile=8.4, 75th Percentile=67; Arms B/C: Minima=1.1, Maxima=83, Median=25, 25th Percentile=10, 75th Percentile=53. f ) % CD3 + CD16 + CD56+ of CD45 + . Arm A: Minima=2.8, Maxima=25, Median=11, 25th Percentile=7.2, 75th Percentile=17; Arms B/C: Minima=3.4, Maxima=64, Median=16, 25th Percentile=8.1, 75th Percentile=28. g ) % NK cells (CD16/CD56 + CD3- of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.40, Maxima=48, Median=1.0, 25th Percentile=0.48, 75th Percentile=4.6; Arms B/C: Minima=0.10, Maxima=62, Median=1.6, 25th Percentile=0.60, 75th Percentile=6.1. h - i ) IFNγ ELISpot with background correction for Arm A ( h ) and Arms B/C ( i ). Negative values after background normalization have been normalized to zero for visual representation.

    Journal: Nature Medicine

    Article Title: Multi-antigen-targeting T cells in pediatric central nervous system tumors: a phase 1 trial

    doi: 10.1038/s41591-026-04449-9

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Flow immunophenotyping release testing data are presented in A-G and IFNγ ELISpot data presented in H-K (Arm A: n = 12; Arms B/C: n = 27). Each data point represents a separate TAA-T cell product infused into patients (biological replicates). Lower whisker is defined as the minima, upper whisker is defined as the maxima, center is defined as median, lower bound of box is defined as Q1 (25th percentile), and upper bound of box is defined as Q3 (75th percentile). a ) % Total T cells (CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=51, Maxima=99, Median=97, 25th Percentile=95, 75th Percentile=99; Arms B/C: Minima=31, Maxima=100, Median=97, 25th Percentile=94, 75th Percentile=98. b ) % CD4 + T cells (CD3 + CD4+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.50, Maxima=88, Median=16, 25th Percentile=2.6, 75th Percentile=38; Arms B/C: Minima=0.40, Maxima=55, Median=9.9, 25th Percentile=6.1, 75th Percentile=17. c ) %CD8 + T cells (% CD3 + CD8+ of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=4.3, Maxima=88, Median=37, 25th Percentile=22, 75th Percentile=47; Arms B/C: Minima=19, Maxima=91, Median=51, 25th Percentile=36, 75th Percentile=71. d ) % αβ T cells (% TCRαβ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=8.2, Maxima=94, Median=69, 25th Percentile=28, 75th Percentile=86; Arms B/C: Minima=32, Maxima=98, Median=71, 25th Percentile=48, 75th Percentile=84. e ) % γδ T cells (% TCRγδ+ of CD3 + ). Arm A: Minima=5.1, Maxima=79, Median=28, 25th Percentile=8.4, 75th Percentile=67; Arms B/C: Minima=1.1, Maxima=83, Median=25, 25th Percentile=10, 75th Percentile=53. f ) % CD3 + CD16 + CD56+ of CD45 + . Arm A: Minima=2.8, Maxima=25, Median=11, 25th Percentile=7.2, 75th Percentile=17; Arms B/C: Minima=3.4, Maxima=64, Median=16, 25th Percentile=8.1, 75th Percentile=28. g ) % NK cells (CD16/CD56 + CD3- of CD45 + ). Arm A: Minima=0.40, Maxima=48, Median=1.0, 25th Percentile=0.48, 75th Percentile=4.6; Arms B/C: Minima=0.10, Maxima=62, Median=1.6, 25th Percentile=0.60, 75th Percentile=6.1. h - i ) IFNγ ELISpot with background correction for Arm A ( h ) and Arms B/C ( i ). Negative values after background normalization have been normalized to zero for visual representation.

    Article Snippet: An FcR blocking agent (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-059-901) was added to the tubes for 5 min to prevent any nonspecific binding, followed by an appropriate antibody mix (shown in tables below), which was incubated in the dark for 15 min. Antibodies for the pan leukocyte panel included CD14 Vio Blue (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-110-524), CD19 FITC (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-113-646), CD16 PE (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-113-393), CD56 PE (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-113-312), CD3 Per CP Vio-770 (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-113-141), CD4 PE-Vio-770 (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-113-227), CD45 APC (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-110-633) and CD8 APC Vio-770 (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-110-681).

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Whisker Assay

    IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), CD4 + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-25-3092

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IL22 upregulates PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells through the UPR IRE1α–XBP1 axis. A, mIF images show the alterations of PD-L1 + tumor cells (purple), CD4 + (green), and CD8 + (red) T cells in orthotopic gastric cancer tumors from control and Abhd16a -knockdown mice following IL22 treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data of gastric cancer tissues with or without IL22 treatment. C, RT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of key downstream molecules of the UPR branches ( XBP1 , ATF4 , ATF6 ) in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown gastric cancer cells. D, Western blotting analysis of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in control and IL22RA1 -knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 (100 μg/L). E, Western blotting detection of PD-L1 and XBP1s levels in XBP1- knockdown MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 and MGC-803 cells treated with IL22 or XBP1s inhibitor (STF083010, 30 μmol/L) in combination with IL22. F, The binding sequence of XBP1 on the CD274 promoter. G and H, ChIP ( G ) and luciferase reporter assay ( H ) showing the transcriptional regulation of CD274 by XBP1s under IL22 stimulation. I, Orthotopic gastric cancer mouse models ( n = 5 per group) were injected with anti-IL22 (200 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody (150 μg per mouse), anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with IL22 (500 ng per mouse), or anti-CD90.2 antibody in combination with XBP1s inhibitors (STF083010, 30 mg/kg) and IL22 for 2 weeks. IHC analysis was used to show IL22, XBP1s, and PD-L1 levels in gastric cancer tissues. Scale bar, 200 μm. J, Tumor volume of orthotopic gastric cancer models under treatments the same as in I . *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, nonsignificant.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used for flow cytometry: Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse CD127 (BioLegend, cat. #135025, RRID: AB_2562114, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD3 (BioLegend, cat. #100203, RRID: AB_312660, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD3 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1013E, RRID: AB_3675272, 5 μL/1×10 6 cells), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD4 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1097H, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC Anti-Mouse CD8a (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1104UC, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD19 (BioLegend, cat. #152403, RRID: AB_2629812, 0.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend, cat. #117305, RRID: AB_313774, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse NK1.1 (BioLegend, cat. #108705, RRID: AB_313392, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #103133, RRID: AB_10899570, 1 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse RORγt (BD Biosciences, cat. #562607, RRID: AB_11153137, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse IL22 (BioLegend, cat. #516411, RRID: AB_2563373, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF647 anti-STAT3 phospho (BioLegend, cat. #651007, RRID: AB_2572085, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #157604, RRID: AB_2876536, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD8b (BioLegend, cat. #126613, RRID: AB_2562774, 0.625 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD4 (BioLegend, cat. #100411, RRID: AB_312696, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend, cat. #141707, RRID: AB_10896057, 2.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend, cat. #157309, RRID: AB_2876535, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD25 (BioLegend, cat. #101907, RRID: AB_961210, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF700 anti-mouse FOXP3 (BioLegend, cat. #126421, RRID: AB_2750492, 0.12 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend, cat. #127607, RRID: AB_1186104, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD274 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1132E, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP-Cyanine5.5 anti–T-bet (eBioscience, cat. #45-5825-80, RRID: AB_953658, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), PE/Dazzle 594 anti-mouse CD273 (BioLegend, cat. #107215, RRID: AB_2728124, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD274 (BioLegend, cat. #124315, RRID: AB_10897097, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), and PE anti-mouse MHC-I (H-2Kk; BioLegend, cat. #114907, RRID: AB_313614, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells).

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Knockdown, RNA Sequencing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Injection

    Combination therapy enhances the anti–PD-L1 immunotherapeutic effect in gastric cancer. A and B, After tumor formation, the orthotopic gastric cancer mice ( n = 5 per group) were treated with anti–PD-L1 (100 μg per mouse), GPR34 inhibitor (20 mg/kg), or XBP1s inhibitor (30 mg/kg) every 3 days or ACh inhibitor (2.5 mg/kg) daily. Combinations of anti–PD-L1 with each inhibitor followed the every 3-day dosing schedule for a total duration of 2 weeks via i.p. injection. Living images were used to monitor tumor progression at 5-day intervals from the time of drug administration ( A ); IHC and mIF were performed to detect PD-L1 and XBP1s levels and proportions of CD4 + (green) and CD8 + (red) T cells in gastric cancer tissues at the end of treatments ( B ). Scale bars, 1.000e+5 –∼ 5.000e + 5 p/s/cm 2 /sr for living images; 200 μm for IHC; 50 μm for immunofluorescence. C and D, Representative images ( C ) and tumor volume ( D ) of subcutaneous tumors. The administration protocol for the mice was consistent with the description provided in A and B . **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: Nerves Stimulate Cross-talk Between Gastric Cancer and Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells to Enhance Immunosuppression

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-25-3092

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Combination therapy enhances the anti–PD-L1 immunotherapeutic effect in gastric cancer. A and B, After tumor formation, the orthotopic gastric cancer mice ( n = 5 per group) were treated with anti–PD-L1 (100 μg per mouse), GPR34 inhibitor (20 mg/kg), or XBP1s inhibitor (30 mg/kg) every 3 days or ACh inhibitor (2.5 mg/kg) daily. Combinations of anti–PD-L1 with each inhibitor followed the every 3-day dosing schedule for a total duration of 2 weeks via i.p. injection. Living images were used to monitor tumor progression at 5-day intervals from the time of drug administration ( A ); IHC and mIF were performed to detect PD-L1 and XBP1s levels and proportions of CD4 + (green) and CD8 + (red) T cells in gastric cancer tissues at the end of treatments ( B ). Scale bars, 1.000e+5 –∼ 5.000e + 5 p/s/cm 2 /sr for living images; 200 μm for IHC; 50 μm for immunofluorescence. C and D, Representative images ( C ) and tumor volume ( D ) of subcutaneous tumors. The administration protocol for the mice was consistent with the description provided in A and B . **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used for flow cytometry: Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse CD127 (BioLegend, cat. #135025, RRID: AB_2562114, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD3 (BioLegend, cat. #100203, RRID: AB_312660, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD3 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1013E, RRID: AB_3675272, 5 μL/1×10 6 cells), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD4 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1097H, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC Anti-Mouse CD8a (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1104UC, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD19 (BioLegend, cat. #152403, RRID: AB_2629812, 0.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend, cat. #117305, RRID: AB_313774, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse NK1.1 (BioLegend, cat. #108705, RRID: AB_313392, 0.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #103133, RRID: AB_10899570, 1 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse RORγt (BD Biosciences, cat. #562607, RRID: AB_11153137, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse IL22 (BioLegend, cat. #516411, RRID: AB_2563373, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF647 anti-STAT3 phospho (BioLegend, cat. #651007, RRID: AB_2572085, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, cat. #157604, RRID: AB_2876536, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD8b (BioLegend, cat. #126613, RRID: AB_2562774, 0.625 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD4 (BioLegend, cat. #100411, RRID: AB_312696, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend, cat. #141707, RRID: AB_10896057, 2.5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend, cat. #157309, RRID: AB_2876535, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), FITC anti-mouse CD25 (BioLegend, cat. #101907, RRID: AB_961210, 2 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), AF700 anti-mouse FOXP3 (BioLegend, cat. #126421, RRID: AB_2750492, 0.12 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PE anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend, cat. #127607, RRID: AB_1186104, 1.25 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), APC anti-mouse CD274 (Elabscience, cat. #E-AB-F1132E, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), PerCP-Cyanine5.5 anti–T-bet (eBioscience, cat. #45-5825-80, RRID: AB_953658, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), PE/Dazzle 594 anti-mouse CD273 (BioLegend, cat. #107215, RRID: AB_2728124, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells), Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD274 (BioLegend, cat. #124315, RRID: AB_10897097, 5 μL/1 × 10 6 cells), and PE anti-mouse MHC-I (H-2Kk; BioLegend, cat. #114907, RRID: AB_313614, 0.25 μg/1 × 10 6 cells).

    Techniques: Injection, Immunofluorescence